Model Comparison → Compare

GPT-5 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Our verdict

Choose based on your ecosystem. GPT-5 mini for OpenAI integrations; Haiku 4.5 for Anthropic stack or 200K context needs.

GPT-5 mini ($0.25/M input) and Claude Haiku 4.5 ($0.80/M input) are both small-model cost leaders. GPT-5 mini is significantly cheaper. Haiku 4.5 has 200K context vs 128K, and performs better on non-English languages. At the same token volume, GPT-5 mini costs about 3× less.

Side-by-side pricing

GPT-5 miniClaude Haiku 4.5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input price/1M$0.25$1.00
Output price/1M$2.00$5.00
Cache read/1M$0.025$0.10
Context window400K200K
Vision
Tool use
Prompt caching
Speed tierFastFast

Prices verified 2026-08-20. See changelog for history.

Winner by task

Cost efficiency
GPT-5 mini
3× cheaper on input ($0.25 vs $0.80/M)
Long context tasks
Claude Haiku 4.5
200K vs 128K context window
Multilingual content
Claude Haiku 4.5
Better handling of non-Latin scripts
OpenAI function calling ecosystem
GPT-5 mini
Direct API compatibility, same SDK

Calculate costs for each model

GPT-5 mini pricing →Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing →Calculate for your workload →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5 mini better than Claude Haiku 4.5?

GPT-5 mini is 3× cheaper on input tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window (200K vs 128K) and better multilingual performance. For English-only classification and extraction at high volume: GPT-5 mini. For anything needing large context or non-English: Haiku 4.5.

Prices verified 2026-08-20. See methodology for calculation details.